Skip to content
The Algorithm logoThe Algorithm
The Algorithm/Knowledge Base/HL7 FHIR
Healthcare Interoperability

HL7 FHIR

FHIR defines reusable healthcare resources and exchange patterns, but real interoperability depends on profiles, terminology, identity, authorization, and workflow behavior.

What You Need to Know

FHIR defines resource types for clinical and administrative concepts and multiple ways to exchange them. In the RESTful framework, systems interact with resources through standardized HTTP operations, search, history, and transaction patterns. The core API does not by itself solve authentication, authorization, patient matching, terminology, consent, or audit collection. Those controls belong in the implementation architecture and the applicable implementation guides.

A syntactically valid resource may still be unusable to the receiving workflow. Teams need to agree on FHIR release, profiles, required elements, extensions, code systems, value sets, reference behavior, identifiers, and error semantics. A CapabilityStatement describes what a server supports, but contract and conformance tests should verify the specific reads, searches, writes, subscriptions, and operations the integration depends on. Identity reconciliation and terminology mapping need explicit exception queues because silent mismatches can create clinical risk.

Implementation begins with the workflow rather than the resource list. An Epic, Oracle Health, payer, laboratory, or research integration may combine FHIR with HL7 v2, documents, vendor APIs, or batch exchange. Teams should inventory interfaces, map provenance, enforce user and application authorization, test minimum-necessary data access, preserve acknowledgements, design downtime queues, and reconcile replay after recovery. Parallel clinical validation is necessary before cutover when the interface can affect care or operational continuity.

How We Handle It

We trace the clinical or administrative workflow, confirm the source system capabilities, select the applicable FHIR release and profiles, and map identity, terminology, authorization, provenance, and failure behavior. Contract tests cover the exact operations used; clinical users validate meaning and workflow; operational tests cover duplicates, out-of-order messages, dependency loss, replay, and reconciliation before broader release.

Primary sources
Services
Service
Healthcare Technology
Service
Data Engineering & Analytics
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Related Frameworks
US Core IG
SMART on FHIR
Da Vinci Project IGs
TEFCAONC Interoperability Rule
DECISION GUIDE

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. Covers data architecture, access controls, audit trails, and vendor due diligence.

Apply HL7 FHIR in regulated industries
Explore Hospitals & Health SystemsExplore Healthcare PayersExplore Pharmaceuticals & Life SciencesExplore Digital HealthExplore BankingExplore InsuranceExplore FintechExplore Government & Public SectorExplore Energy & UtilitiesExplore TelecommunicationsExplore Retail & E-Commerce
§

Compliance built at the architecture level.

Deploy a team that knows your regulatory landscape before they write their first line of code.

Start the conversation
Related
Service
Healthcare Technology
Service
Data Engineering & Analytics
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Related Framework
SMART on FHIR
Platform
ALICE Compliance Engine
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Engagement
Surgical Strike (Tier I)
Why Switch
vs. Accenture
Get Started
Start a Conversation
Engage Us