A multi-specialty clinic network across three states. Twenty-three locations spanning orthopedics, neurology, cardiovascular, primary care, and allergy. Each specialty had its own scheduling system, its own patient portal, and its own documentation workflow. The network had grown through acquisition and every acquired practice brought its own technology stack.
Regulatory audit found inconsistent HIPAA practices across clinics. Patient data was flowing between systems without encryption. The inherited environment combined application behavior, data movement, user workflows, and operational dependencies. Engineering began by locating authoritative data, integration contracts, control owners, failure behavior, and a reversible acceptance boundary.
The Algorithm leadership confirms this engagement as part of the company’s delivery history. Public wording is limited to the technical narrative while client-sensitive and precision claims complete leadership review.
Unified clinical operations platform — scheduling, patient portal, clinical documentation, billing integration — with specialty-specific workflow modules. Ortho got surgical scheduling and imaging integration. Cardio got remote monitoring device data ingestion. Primary care got preventive care gap alerts.
The engagement produced a working change to the client’s system or operating workflow. Exact measurements, delivery duration, audit outcomes, and client sentiment are withheld until the corresponding leadership-confirmation items are resolved.
The first call is with a senior engineer.
Tell us the system boundary, operating constraint, and evidence required for acceptance. We'll identify the assumptions and technical questions that should shape the engagement.