Regional hospital system in the American Midwest. A mix of acute care hospitals, outpatient surgical centers, and affiliated physician practices running on fragmented systems that didn't talk to each other. Patient records lived in four different platforms. Nurses spent more time navigating software than treating patients.
Go-live had been pushed three times. The compliance team had flagged HIPAA gaps in the new system's access controls that the vendor classified as 'post-launch remediation.' The board demanded a decision: fix it or kill it.
The Algorithm leadership confirms this engagement as part of the company’s delivery history. Public wording is limited to the technical narrative while client-sensitive and precision claims complete leadership review.
Unified EHR integration layer across all twelve facilities. HL7 FHIR APIs connecting legacy departmental systems to the new clinical platform. Role-based access control architecture mapped directly to HIPAA minimum necessary requirements. Real-time audit logging for every PHI access event.
The engagement produced a working change to the client’s system or operating workflow. Exact measurements, delivery duration, audit outcomes, and client sentiment are withheld until the corresponding leadership-confirmation items are resolved.
The first call is with a senior engineer.
Tell us the system boundary, operating constraint, and evidence required for acceptance. We'll identify the assumptions and technical questions that should shape the engagement.