They had assembled their SOC from best-of-breed point tools — a SIEM, a ticketing system, a threat intel platform, an EDR console, a vulnerability scanner — none of which talked to each other. Analysts spent more time switching between tools and copy-pasting data than actually analyzing threats.
Exit interviews told the same story: the tools made the job harder, not easier. Experienced analysts were drowning in context-switching. New analysts couldn't ramp up because the workflow lived in tribal knowledge, not in systems.
The Algorithm leadership confirms this engagement as part of the company’s delivery history. Public wording is limited to the technical narrative while client-sensitive and precision claims complete leadership review.
Single-pane-of-glass integrating SIEM alerts, EDR telemetry, threat intelligence feeds, vulnerability data, and ticketing into one analyst workspace. Automated enrichment — when an alert fires, the platform automatically pulls IP reputation, domain intelligence, user history, asset inventory, and relevant threat intel before the analyst opens the ticket. Playbook engine executing investigation steps automatically for known attack patterns. Incident timeline builder — automatic reconstruction of attack sequences from correlated events.
The engagement produced a working change to the client’s system or operating workflow. Exact measurements, delivery duration, audit outcomes, and client sentiment are withheld until the corresponding leadership-confirmation items are resolved.
The first call is with a senior engineer.
Tell us the system boundary, operating constraint, and evidence required for acceptance. We'll identify the assumptions and technical questions that should shape the engagement.