Building In-House’s Cloud Infrastructure & Migration vs. ours

Building In-House's approach to Cloud Infrastructure & Migration reflects their broader delivery model: large teams, long timelines, and a scope that expands with the engagement rather than resolving it. Hiring takes months, scaling takes years

Cloud Infrastructure & Migration requires a specific kind of engineering precision that generalist delivery models do not produce. The capabilities required — Cloud architecture design for regulated workloads, Compliance-preserving lift-and-shift migration, Multi-cloud and hybrid infrastructure — are not skills that scale with headcount. They require engineers who have delivered these systems in production environments.

Our Cloud Infrastructure & Migration practice deploys teams with production experience in the specific capabilities this service requires. Cloud migration in regulated industries fails when compliance is treated as a post-migration concern. We map compliance requirements to cloud architecture before a single workload moves. Every configuration choice — region selection, encryption key management, access control design — is made with the regulatory framework as a design input, not a post-migration checklist.

Fixed-price delivery with defined milestones. The first milestone is always a working system component — not a document. The engagement closes with full IP transfer: source code, documentation, and the operational capability for your team to run the system independently.

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. For teams building in regulated industries.