Skip to content
The Algorithm
vs Deloitte×Healthcare
Why Healthcare companies switch

The Algorithm vs. Deloitte in Healthcare — Hospitals & Health Systems

Deloitte's healthcare consulting practice is extensive. There is a better model.

The Problem

What Deloitte gets wrong in Healthcare

Deloitte's healthcare consulting practice is extensive. Their healthcare IT implementation practice is a different matter. Health system CIOs have seen the pattern: Deloitte engages at the executive level, proposes a transformation program, and delivers a system that requires significant remediation before it can support clinical operations.

Clinical systems have zero tolerance for the kind of architectural debt that Deloitte's phased delivery model accumulates. When your EHR integration produces duplicate patient records, the risk is not user inconvenience — it is medication errors, duplicate billing, and HIPAA violations that trigger OCR investigations.

HIPAA compliance consulting and HIPAA-compliant system architecture are not the same thing. Deloitte produces HIPAA assessments and remediation roadmaps. We produce systems where HIPAA compliance is enforced at the infrastructure layer, not documented in a workstream.

Zimmer Biomet suing for $170M+ — ERP couldn't ship products
Medicaid software errors persisted for a decade across 20 states
Australia: AI-generated report with fabricated citations
$5.1B Pentagon contracts cancelled
The Algorithm

What we deploy instead

Healthcare system integrations require engineers who understand HL7 FHIR v4, C-CDA document standards, and the operational reality of a system that cannot have planned downtime during a trauma surge. We staff these engagements specifically.

Our clinical systems experience spans hospital systems, health networks, and the integration layer between them. Epic, Cerner, and Oracle Health integrations — we have built them, remediated them, and modernized them.

Compliance

HIPAA and HITRUST built into the architecture from day one — enforced automatically by ALICE at every commit.

Delivery

Fixed-price engagements. Production system in 8-20 weeks. No discovery phase. No change orders.

Team

Domain-qualified engineers with healthcare experience. The senior engineer who scopes the engagement is the senior engineer who delivers it.

IP

Full source code and documentation transferred at close. No licensing. No managed services dependency.

Compliance

The compliance difference

HIPAA, HITRUST, SOC 2, and FDA 21 CFR Part 11 for clinical research systems. Every system we deploy for a health system is architecturally compliant from the first infrastructure decision.

hipaa
hitrust
soc 2
fda 21 cfr part 11
Typical Engagement

What switching from Deloitte looks like

Health system technology engagement: 12-20 weeks for a defined integration or modernization scope. Team: 8-14 engineers with clinical technology experience. Fixed price. No discovery phase — we scope based on your current architecture.

Week 1

Architecture review and scope definition. We review existing deliverables and identify gaps.

Weeks 2-4

Scope locked, team assembled, first sprint underway. Working code from week two.

Weeks 8-12

First production milestone — a working integration or system component, not a document.

Close

Full IP transfer. Source code, documentation, operational runbooks. Your team runs the system.

DECISION GUIDE

Failed Vendor Recovery Playbook

Step-by-step framework for recovering from a failed Deloitte engagement — from emergency stabilisation through full re-platforming. 4-phase playbook covering stabilise, assess, transition, and normalise.

X

Replacing Deloitte in Healthcare? We've done this before.

HIPAA-compliant healthcare engineering. Fixed price. Production in 8-20 weeks.

Start the Conversation
Related
Compare
vs Deloitte
Compare
All Comparisons
Market
Healthcare — Hospitals & Health Systems
Solution
Failed Vendor Recovery
Solution
Compliance Remediation
Get Started
Contact Us
Engage Us