Skip to content
The Algorithm
The Algorithm/Knowledge Base/DevSecOps
Engineering Methodology

DevSecOps

DevSecOps integrates security into every phase of the software development lifecycle — making security a continuous engineering activity rather than a pre-release gate.

What You Need to Know

DevSecOps — development, security, and operations — is the practice of integrating security tools, testing, and practices throughout the CI/CD pipeline. In traditional development, security review happens at the end of the development cycle: a security team reviews the completed system and produces a report that engineering must then remediate. This creates the same economics problem as compliance retrofitting — security findings discovered after build are 10-100x more expensive to fix than those caught during development.

A mature DevSecOps pipeline includes: static application security testing (SAST) that runs on every commit to catch code-level vulnerabilities, software composition analysis (SCA) that scans dependencies for known CVEs, infrastructure-as-code security scanning that validates cloud configurations against security benchmarks, container image scanning that checks for OS and package vulnerabilities before deployment, dynamic application security testing (DAST) against running services, and secrets detection that prevents credentials from entering the codebase.

DevSecOps requires a shift in security ownership — from a centralized security team that reviews finished work to developers who own security outcomes for their own code. This is as much a cultural change as a technical one, but it is enabled by tooling: developers who get security feedback in their IDE or within minutes of a commit can act on it immediately. Developers who receive a PDF report six weeks after they wrote the code are disconnected from the context needed to understand and fix the finding.

How We Handle It

We build DevSecOps into the engineering workflow from day one — integrating SAST, SCA, IaC scanning, container scanning, and secrets detection into the CI/CD pipeline, establishing security gates that block deployments with unacceptable risk profiles, and instrumenting production systems for continuous security monitoring. Security findings are surfaced to developers in their workflow, not delivered as reports to a separate team.

Services
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Service
Self-Healing Infrastructure
Service
AI Platform Engineering
Related Frameworks
SOC 2ISO 27001FedRAMPCMMC
DECISION GUIDE

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. Covers data architecture, access controls, audit trails, and vendor due diligence.

§

Compliance built at the architecture level.

Deploy a team that knows your regulatory landscape before they write their first line of code.

Start the conversation
Related
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Service
Self-Healing Infrastructure
Service
AI Platform Engineering
Related Framework
SOC 2
Related Framework
ISO 27001
Related Framework
FedRAMP
Platform
ALICE Compliance Engine
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Engagement
Surgical Strike (Tier I)
Why Switch
vs. Accenture
Get Started
Start a Conversation
Engage Us