Skip to content
The Algorithm logoThe Algorithm
The Algorithm/Knowledge Base/RAG Pipelines
AI Architecture

RAG Pipelines

Retrieval-Augmented Generation grounds language model outputs in your organization's actual data — eliminating hallucination risk for enterprise knowledge workflows.

What You Need to Know

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) solves the core problem of using language models on private enterprise data: a model trained on public data does not know your internal documentation, your product specifications, your regulatory filings, or your historical records. RAG retrieves relevant documents from your knowledge base at inference time and provides them as context to the model — so the model can answer questions about your data without being trained on it, and without that data leaving your infrastructure.

A production RAG pipeline is more than a vector database and an embedding model. The retrieval architecture must handle document chunking strategies that preserve context across chunk boundaries, embedding models appropriate for the domain and language of your content, hybrid search combining semantic and keyword retrieval for better coverage, re-ranking of retrieved documents to surface the most relevant content, and citation of sources in the generated output so users can verify claims. Each of these components requires engineering judgment informed by the specific retrieval task.

In regulated industries, RAG pipelines have a compliance dimension that general-purpose implementations ignore. The retrieval layer must enforce access controls — a user who is not authorized to access a document should not receive information derived from it, even indirectly through an AI response. For HIPAA-regulated content, the retrieval layer must enforce PHI access permissions. For financial services, it must prevent retrieval of information that would constitute material non-public information in certain contexts. These constraints are architectural, not instructional.

How We Handle It

We design RAG architectures from the retrieval task outward — selecting chunking strategies, embedding models, and retrieval approaches based on the specific content and query patterns of each engagement. Access-controlled retrieval is a standard requirement for regulated industry deployments. We implement hybrid search, re-ranking, and source citation as baseline capabilities, not optional features.

Services
Service
Agentic AI Engineering
Service
AI Platform Engineering
Service
Data Engineering & Analytics
Related Frameworks
HIPAAGDPRSOC 2NIST AI RMF
Decision context

Retrieval quality is a data and authorization problem before it is a prompt problem.

This page owns the informational architecture of retrieval-augmented generation. It explains how source ingestion, permissions, chunking, indexing, retrieval, citations, evaluation, deletion, and freshness operate as one production data path.

Answers cite the wrong truth

The index contains stale procedures, duplicate policies, draft documents, or chunks stripped of the context needed to interpret them.

Retrieval leaks protected data

Documents were indexed globally and filtered after retrieval, allowing tenant, role, purpose, or record-level boundaries to be crossed.

Teams cannot explain regressions

A model, embedding, chunking rule, reranker, or source changed without a versioned evaluation that isolates the cause.

Engineering decisions

What a production-ready approach must resolve.

Source contracts

Record authority, owner, classification, entitlement, effective date, retention, deletion, and change semantics before content is indexed.

Permission-aware retrieval

Apply access policy before candidates reach the model. Preserve principal and source identity through filters, caches, reranking, citations, and traces.

Retrieval evaluation

Measure coverage, relevance, groundedness, citation correctness, abstention, protected-data leakage, and adversarial-document behavior against a representative corpus.

Lifecycle operations

Version parsers, embeddings, indexes, prompts, and models; monitor freshness and failures; propagate deletion; and retain a last-known-good rollback path.

Relevant company experience

Engagements connected to this problem.

Buyer questions

Questions to settle before committing.

Do we need a vector database?

Not always. Keyword, structured, graph, or hybrid retrieval may fit the information and query better. Choose from evidence, filtering, latency, update, and operational requirements.

How do we keep RAG permissions aligned with source systems?

Ingest source access metadata, resolve it against the current principal at query time, test denied cases, and invalidate derived stores when membership or source permissions change.

What should happen when retrieval confidence is low?

The workflow should abstain, narrow the question, route to a human, or use an approved deterministic source. It should not fill missing evidence with model confidence.

Next useful step

Review Your Retrieval Architecture

Bring representative sources, access rules, queries, and failure examples. We will assess the data path and evaluation boundary.

Review Your Retrieval Architecture
DECISION GUIDE

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. Covers data architecture, access controls, audit trails, and vendor due diligence.

Apply RAG Pipelines in regulated industries
Explore Hospitals & Health SystemsExplore Healthcare PayersExplore Pharmaceuticals & Life SciencesExplore Digital HealthExplore BankingExplore InsuranceExplore FintechExplore Government & Public SectorExplore Energy & UtilitiesExplore TelecommunicationsExplore Retail & E-Commerce
§

Compliance built at the architecture level.

Deploy a team that knows your regulatory landscape before they write their first line of code.

Start the conversation
Related
Service
Agentic AI Engineering
Service
AI Platform Engineering
Service
Data Engineering & Analytics
Related Framework
HIPAA
Related Framework
GDPR
Related Framework
SOC 2
Platform
ALICE Compliance Engine
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Engagement
Surgical Strike (Tier I)
Why Switch
vs. Accenture
Get Started
Start a Conversation
Engage Us