They had a growing population of patients with implanted cardiac devices generating continuous monitoring data. Each device manufacturer provided their own siloed monitoring portal. A single cardiologist might need to check three different portals to review all their patients' device data.
A patient with a loop recorder had an arrhythmia event flagged in the manufacturer's portal. The patient was fine — but the near-miss triggered an urgent demand for a unified monitoring solution.
The Algorithm leadership confirms this engagement as part of the company’s delivery history. Public wording is limited to the technical narrative while client-sensitive and precision claims complete leadership review.
Unified remote cardiac monitoring platform. Integration APIs pulling device data from four manufacturer portals into a single clinical interface. Real-time alert engine with configurable thresholds per patient and per condition. Longitudinal patient view showing device data alongside clinical history, medications, and prior interventions.
The engagement produced a working change to the client’s system or operating workflow. Exact measurements, delivery duration, audit outcomes, and client sentiment are withheld until the corresponding leadership-confirmation items are resolved.
The first call is with a senior engineer.
Tell us the system boundary, operating constraint, and evidence required for acceptance. We'll identify the assumptions and technical questions that should shape the engagement.